PRESSURE is continuing to mount on Prime Minister David Cameron over Culture Secretary Maria Miller and her expenses claims as Tory MPs vented their anger and a public petition calling for her to repay £45,000 or resign approached 70,000 signatures.
Mr Cameron, having yet again to defend publicly his Cabinet colleague, let it be known he was now "very open" to tougher regulation of MPs.
Having refused a Labour MP's application to call a Coalition minister to the Commons to defend Ms Miller, Speaker John Bercow, in response to points of order from Opposition backbenchers, said MPs' concerns about self-regulation were "widely shared by our constituents" and he made clear he was "very open" to the idea of a debate on the subject.
After looking into her expenses, Kathryn Hudson, Westminster's standards watchdog, ruled the Culture Secretary should repay £45,800. Yet the Commons Committee on Standards, which has the final say on issues of ethics and discipline, reduced this to just £5800.
Documents showed Ms Miller told Ms Hudson she might go over her head to ask MPs to intervene. There have also been claims of intimidation, since denied, that pressure was put on newspapers to stop probing into Ms Miller's expenses.
The Culture Secretary was cleared of funding a home for her parents at taxpayers' expense but was criticised by MPs for taking an obstructive attitude towards the standards commissioner's inquiry.
One senior Tory demanded the PM sack Ms Miller and accused him of "scrabbling around for a line to take to avoid having to confront her".
Another described the situation as "ghastly", noting: "It is just making us look all the same. "
But Mr Cameron has stood by his colleague, saying yesterday: "What matters is doing the right thing. Maria has done the right thing by repaying the money, making an apology and now getting on with her job."
Pressed on whether she was still in her post because she was a state-educated woman, the PM replied: "Maria Miller is in her job because she is doing a good job as Culture Secretary."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article