Newspaper and magazine publishers are to take politicians to court over a decision they warn could imperil press freedoms.
They have also announced plans to fast-track a new industry-led watchdog, which will be up and running just after Christmas.
The latest step in a bitter battle between politicians and the press in the wake of the phone hacking inquiry follows a decision by the Privy Council to reject industry plans for a new regulator created by a royal charter.
The Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats back plans for a rival Royal Charter, which the Queen could be asked to sign off on as soon as next week.
Opponents argue it could give politicians the power to meddle in the running of the press.
Lord Black of Brentwood, the chairman of the Press Standards Board of Finance (PressBof), said: "The decision by the Government and the Privy Council on this matter has enormous ramifications for free speech both here in the UK, and - because of our leadership role in the Commonwealth and developing world - across the globe.
"The Government and the Privy Council should have applied the most rigorous standards of consultation and examination of the Royal Charter proposed by the industry, which would have enshrined tough regulatory standards at the same time as protecting press freedom.
"They singularly failed to do so, and that is why - as the issues at stake are so extraordinarily high - we are having to take this course of action."
Last night campaign group Hacked Off criticised the move saying the newspaper industry was exposing itself as "desperate and deaf" and called on it to do what "the public expects of them".
Both Royal Charters would create panels to oversee independent regulators with the power to impose £1 million fines.
However, under the politician's plans changes could be made with the support of two-thirds of MPs, prompting fears of political interference.
Earlier this week the Queen was urged by a group of international press freedom bodies not to sign the politician's charter.
The creation of an independent regulator was the main recommendation of the Leveson report into press ethics, ordered by David Cameron in the wake of the phone hacking scandal.
Bob Satchwell, executive director of the Society of Editors said that the industry's plan would create the toughest regulatory system in the Western world.
He added that UK newspapers produce millions of stories a year "most of which raise no calls for complaint".
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport welcomed the progress the industry had made on establishing a new regulator but expressed disappointment it had decided to take legal action.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article