THE UK Government has suffered humiliation after going down to its first legislative defeat over pubs and beer.
More than 40 Tory and Liberal Democrat MPs rebelled to allow pub landlords to buy beer from whichever company they liked rather than that which own their premises.
A broadly-backed amendment to the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Bill, signed by MPs from all three main parties, was approved by 284 votes to 259, a majority of 25. The Lib-Con Coalition's majority is normally around 60.
This is its first real defeat because it was the first time the Government lost a vote without collective responsibility being formally suspended.
Loud cheers from the Labour benches greeted the result while shouts of "resign" were also heard. An ironic shout of "well done, Chief Whip" was aimed at Conservative Michael Gove. There were reports that Business Minister Matt Hancock was seen grovelling to Prime Minister David Cameron following the defeat.
Almost half of Britain's 50,000 pubs are run by tenants under "beer-tie" agreements, which mean they buy beer from the firm that holds their lease at above market prices in return for subsidised rent or other benefits. Some publicans have claimed unfair treatment and very low earnings from such deals.
Government plans to allow publicans to challenge rental prices had ruled out a rent-only option that would let publicans buy beer on the open market, citing concerns that it could hurt companies and the industry.
The amended legislation, still has to pass through several parliamentary stages before it is enacted. The Campaign for Real Ale group said the vote was a landmark victory handing publicans more options.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article