THE UK Government has warned republicans who received official letters assuring them they were not being hunted by police they can no longer rely on them.
Northern Ireland Secretary Theresa Villiers said the UK Government was not prepared to stand over the factual accuracy of the documents any more, after numerous errors were flagged up in a judge-led review of the so-called on-the-run (OTR) scheme.
But she told a Westminster committee that there were no plans to introduce legislation to change the status of the letters, insisting the most appropriate way of making clear they were no longer of value was with a public statement.
Ms Villiers outlined her intention to the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee but said she intended to make a more detailed statement to Parliament within days. She said recipients should not rely on the letters.
"If they drew some comfort from those letters in the past they should no longer draw comfort from them in the future," she said.
The issue was thrust into public prominence in February when the case against a man accused of murdering four soldiers in the Hyde Park bombing by the IRA collapsed because it emerged he had been sent one of the letters in error, when in fact police were seeking him.
The Old Bailey trial judge found that John Downey's arrest in the UK last year, when he had been told he was free to return, represented an abuse of process.
Downey, 62, from Co Donegal, denied involvement in the 1982 attack. In July, the judge-led review of the scheme, which was agreed between Sinn Fein and the last Labour administration, found that it was systematically flawed in operation but not unlawful in principle.
Lady Justice Hallett said a "catastrophic" error had been made in the Downey case but she insisted the letters of assurance did not amount to amnesties.
Under the scheme, which started running in 2000, almost 190 republicans who had left the UK received assurances they were no longer being sought
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article