THERE was no Punch, no Judy but Sam Cam popped in to make sure her husband was keeping the Opposition on its toes.
She needn't have worried.
Red Ed was in full "serious and sober" mode, being a good comrade and, for a change, backing up the PM. The issue was the Ukraine, serious and sober stuff, which meant that the political cudgels for once were kept unused.
But the only true moment of party political nose-tweaking came when Labour's former Foreign Secretary, the lawyerly Jack Straw, raised the somewhat obscure issue of the Trans-Pennine Express.
The MP for Blackburn conjured up a level of indignation when he informed colleagues that the said train service, which serves the north of England, was moving one in eight of its trains to, shock horror, Chiltern Railways for the "greater comfort and convenience of commuters in the south of England".
At this point, Tory MPs began to titter, so much so that the right honourable gentleman could not continue and the Speaker had to intervene. The source of their merriment appeared to be that Mr S has a home, er, in the Cotswolds and, not just that, but in the very constituency of one David Cameron.
The ex-Secretary of State, when he got back to his feet, hit back, saying: "I just say to members opposite, this may be a laughing matter for them, it is certainly not a laughing matter for people in the north of England." Mr Straw was in such a huff he continued on speaking even after the microphone relaying his voice was turned off.
Blue Dave was smirking all the way through and when he got to his feet to respond we all knew the reason why.
"I hope he won't find it too cheeky if I point out the line both he and I use, of course, the Cotwolds line and Charlbury railway station, has also received a lot of extra investment under this Government. He now enjoys a double track line when he makes his journey from my constituency into London."
As the Tories cheered, good old Jack couldn't help raising a wry smile himself.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article