A DEAL to save Grangemouth from closure will secure its future for a "quarter of a century", Alex Salmond has said, as the reprieve for the petrochemical plant secured thousands of Scottish jobs.
The First Minister praised everyone for "pulling together" to pin down an agreement, including the UK and Scottish governments.
But he said it was ridiculous for anyone to suggest the heft of the UK Government had brought about the resolution and warned no-one should use the drama of the past 72 hours to score political points in the referendum debate.
He said: "People who attempt to play constitutional politics in this will end up with egg right over their face."
Prime Minister David Cameron praised those who worked to preserve the plant, a key part of the Scottish and UK economy.
The reversal by Swiss-based Ineos of its initial decision to close the plant followed acceptance by the Unite union of a survival plan for the business. This includes a three-year pay freeze, an end to the final salary pension scheme and a promise of no strike action for three years.
Just 48 hours before, the owners made clear that they would shut down the petrochemical plant, on which the jobs of 800 employees and 2000 contractors depended, because the site workers had refused to sign up to the proposed changes. Jim Ratcliffe, the chairman of Ineos, said that the union's about-turn was a "victory for common sense" and that a multimillion-pound investment would now be made into the site.
But he decried the personal attacks made against him, saying: "At the end of the day, I am going to have to write a cheque for £300 million.
"I don't think it's very bright of the unions to abuse the person who is going to commit £300m, which is what Grangemouth needs to survive."
Earlier in the day, staff cheered loudly when they were told news of the turnaround at a mass meeting with managers.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article