A TOTAL reversal in public attitudes to same-sex relationships has taken place over the course of just 30 years, according to a leading expert on opinion polling.
Professor John Curtice, of Strathclyde University, who was giving evidence on plans to legalise same-sex marriage, revealed that in the 1980s public attitudes to homosexuality were very conservative and actually became less tolerant during that decade as the AIDS crisis worsened.
In the British Social Attitudes (BSA) survey in 1983, 62% of respondents said same-sex relationships were "always" or "mostly" wrong, compared with 21% who saw this as "rarely" or "not at all wrong" and by 1987, those registering disapproval had risen to 74%.
But in a submission to Holyrood, Professor Curtice charted "one of the most marked changes in attitudes to have been identified by the BSA", writing: "Attitudes have gradually but consistently become more liberal.
"In 2003, shortly before the introduction of civil partnerships for same-sex couples, the proportion who felt that same relations were rarely or not all wrong outnumbered those who felt that they were always or mostly wrong for the first time.
"Thereafter, attitudes have become yet more liberal such that, according to the most recent reading, taken in 2012, as many as 57% now say that same relations are rarely or not all wrong, while just 28% feel that they are always or mostly wrong.
"The balance of opinion on the subject is now almost a mirror image of what it was 30 years ago."
Professor Curtice said a more liberal attitude to sexual mores extended not just to homosexuality but to unmarried couples living together and having children, and to abortion.
He said the exception was the view of infidelity in relationships, which had hardened in disapproval.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article