SNP ministers have hit out at the UK Government, accusing it of prioritising nuclear power at the expense of wind farms.
The row follows a decision to omit all planned Scottish offshore wind farms from a list of 10 "affordable" projects likely to receive UK Government support.
The developments could now miss out on a share of subsidies worth £4.5 billion.
SSE, the energy company behind one of the schemes, has already said it was disappointed by the announcement.
Energy Minister Fergus Ewing said that the decision had serious implications for Scotland's offshore wind industry and would increase uncertainty for developers and investors.
He also criticised the UK Government's priorities, saying: "They should be supporting the release of our green energy potential instead of being hell-bent on ploughing billions into nuclear power stations, which restricts the funds available to support renewables."
Liberal Democrat Energy Secretary Ed Davey has said that it would be a complete mistake to see the announcement of the 10 projects as somehow worrying for Scotland.
Schemes omitted from the list are eligible to apply for other subsidies or another round of the current funding in October next year.
Graham Lang of campaign group Scotland Against Spin, said: "The wind industry is hooked on public subsidy."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article