NICOLA Sturgeon has not ruled out the possibility that the SNP could take legal action to try to ensure the party, now the UK's third largest, gets a place in the important party leaders' debates on TV in the run-up to the General Election.
During her visit to London for talks with Prime Minister David Cameron, the First Minister made clear that since the independence referendum - with membership of the SNP nearing 100,000 - the political landscape across the UK had changed significantly and for the broadcasters to ignore this was "not on".
"It would be completely unacceptable for the SNP and indeed the Greens and Plaid Cymru to be excluded from the General Elections debates," declared Ms Sturgeon.
Asked if the SNP were excluded by the broadcasters, would it consider taking legal action to ensure it was able to participate in them, she replied: "At this stage, I wouldn't rule anything out because the principle of being included and not being excluded is a very important one to us."
Leanne Wood, the Plaid Cymru leader, stressed how the Nationalist parties in Wales and Scotland provided an alternative to Westminster's austerity programme and cuts to public services.
"As the only parties, together with the Greens, to reject the cuts consensus, it is unjustifiable and undemocratic to exclude our three parties from proposed leaders' debates during the forthcoming UK elections," she argued.
But Nick Clegg warned Ms Sturgeon and Ms Wood not to give David Cameron a reason to pull out of the debates.
He told his regular Whitehall press conference: "The debates are a good idea, a good innovation. What people want to see is the three main Westminster parties represented there; others will make their own claims to do so as well."
He then added: "It's very important, not least the Conservative Party is so reluctant to hold these TV debates altogether, Nicola Sturgeon, Nigel Farage, the Greens et al don't unwittingly give the Conservatives an alibi to back out of those debates. They must happen and they must happen in the way the public will welcome."
Later in response, Ms Sturgeon, at a briefing with Ms Wood and Natalie Bennett, the Green leader in England and Wales, dismissed as "pretty lame" Mr Clegg's warning that their objections could block the TV debates altogether.
"There is a democratic principle at stake here," she declared. "UK politics has changed. There has been a coalition government for the past five years; we live now in a much more multiparty democracy than has ever been the case in the UK before.
"Clearly in Scotland in the period since the referendum, we have seen a surge in the Greens but a considerable surge in the SNP as well. The SNP is now the third biggest party by membership in the entire UK.
"It is potentially the case that we are heading for a hung parliament where our parties may have significant influence on what happens and who forms a government. We are articulating it as a principle that's important to our parties...but it is a democratic principle that is very important to the electorate as well.
"If I was a voting member of the public in England, I would want to hear what the SNP would do in the scenario of a hung parliament," added the FM.
Earlier this month, the BBC, ITV, Sky and Channel 4 announced joint plans to hold three debates in the six weeks before polling day.
One would be a head-to-head between Mr Cameron and Labour leader Ed Miliband; the second would involve these two leaders plus Mr Clegg while the third would also include Mr Farage, the Ukip leader.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article