THE gentleman's not for purring.
Asked whether he would leave Tory activists "purring" when he addresses the party conference in Birmingham later today, David Cameron said: "That is a word which I'm going to avoid from now on."
There were, however, some feline sounds emanating from Symphony Hall during the keynote speech by Boris Johnson, who told delegates that thanks to the "wisdom of a clear majority of Scots", London remained the capital of England, Britain and the United Kingdom and would remain so for a lifetime. "You have permission to purr," he said. They did.
Ungrateful or what? The PM during his referendum victory chat with Scottish Tory activists at the Scots fringe had the occasion to mention Douglas Alexander, one of Labour's big beasts who helped save the Union, but whom Mr C quipped: "You know Dougie, he uses 50,000 words where one will do."
Back to the straw-tousled London Mayor, who delivered somewhat of a garbled message when he alighted on, post-referendum, the subject he termed constitutional common sense.
"I want to end the nonsense that allows Labour MPs to sit in Parliament and vote on English matters when English MPs have absolutely no corresponding say over such matters and indeed no Scottish MPs have no say over those matters as far as they might affect their own constituents. Only David Cameron is pledged to sort out that anomaly." Phew.
It may be the London Mayor does want to ban all Labour MPs from speaking in Parliament, but I think we knew what he meant.
As Alistair Darling contemplates his future post-referendum, Ruth Davidson noted: "Alistair's got so many rounds of applause at this conference. It's ruined his reputation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article