ALL non-SNP seats in Scotland, 53 out of 59, are now marginals with the outcome on May 7 uncertain, according to analysis by the Electoral Reform Society.
Although the General Election is four weeks away, the ERS says its new analysis shows that the winners in more than half of all the seats across the UK can be safely called; of a population of 60m, some 26m people live in safe seats.
But while the campaign group says it can confidently predict the winners in 364 of the 650 seats, 56 per cent of the total, based on how "safe" they were in 2010 and in line with current national and local opinion polls, it notes that this is not the case in Scotland.
Of the 303 Conservative seats, the ERS concludes 186 are safe, of the 257 Labour seats, 150 are safe, of the 56 Liberal Democrat seats, just seven are safe and of the SNP's six seats, five are safe.
The ERS, which campaigns to replace the traditional First-Past-the-Post system at Westminster with Proportional Representation, says: "In the case of Scotland, due to the unpredictability created by the large poll swing towards SNP since 2010, all non-SNP seats have been classified as marginal."
It adds: "We can predict that 42 per cent of the seats in Scotland will be won by men - 25 of the 59, whereas only three will definitely be won by a woman. Indeed, 13 seats only have men standing; across all the parties."
Willie Sullivan, the Director of ERS Scotland, said: "The 2015 election may be exciting and unpredictable in Scotland but it remains the case that the First-Past-The-Post voting system will result in a disproportionate result and that most voters only have two choices; SNP or Labour.
"Voters across Scotland are grappling with a choice between tactical voting and voting for what they believe in. Every vote could count if we had a fairer voting system," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article