A CONSERVATIVE MP has sparked criticism from a Nationalist MP after claiming that benefits-takers should not be allowed or encouraged to have more than two children.
Pauline Latham told the Commons that workers who do not receive tax credits, and have the number of children they can afford, should not be subsidising other people to have more children
She claimed Eilidh Whiteford, the SNP's welfare spokeswoman, had used her response to the Budget to support a "completely mad" system in which people on benefits would be allowed to have three, four or five children - at the expense of "responsible" people who do not receive welfare payments.
But Ms Whiteford disagreed with the Tory MP's interpretation of her speech, adding she had been misrepresented.
The Government has proposed limiting support through tax credits to two children from April 2017.
Speaking during the Budget debate, Ms Latham, an MP in Derbyshire, said: "I found it astonishing that (Ms Whiteford) should be advocating that people on benefits should be allowed to have, and encouraged to have, more than two children whereas people who are completely responsible, and recognise that children are expensive to bring up, who can't afford to bring them up because they're not on benefits, are choosing to subsidise those that she would like to see have three, four, five children, which is completely mad."
Ms Whiteford replied: "I have to say to you I think you misrepresent what I actually said and what the record will show I said.
"I think the point I was really trying to make was that half of all families in Scotland receive tax credits and a huge majority of the people receiving them are in work, people who work extremely hard."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article