THE leader of the Tories on a Scots council has called for an inquiry into local boundary changes, claiming his party may have lost a seat over six years ago as a result.
East Renfrewshire Council's Conservative Group Leader Gordon Wallace said a routine polling station consultation showed 13 properties across two wards had been incorrectly allocated.
The mistakes date back to 2006 when boundaries were changed to accommodate the new multi-member ward system.
Mr Wallace said these houses, across the two wards, may have accounted for around 30 votes and secured his party a seat in the 2007 poll.
The seat was won by the SNP, with successful candidate Alastair Carmichael now the East Renfrewshire Provost. Mr Wallace has alleged that one of the affected households was occupied by an SNP council candidate and his family and that their votes contributed to the Tory defeat.
He said: "Thirty votes may not sound a lot but half of these were in a ward where we lost a council seat to an SNP candidate by eight votes and where we know one of the affected households was occupied by an SNP council candidate and his family.
"This is a travesty for local democracy and gives a new meaning to the term 'every vote counts'. We are on the eve of one of the most historic votes in our nation's history and we have an electoral registration system that has proved sufficiently unstable to produce what is at best a dubious result and at worst the completely wrong result."
East Renfrewshire Council confirmed a mistake was made in the Electoral Registers in 2006, during the changes to ward boundaries that took effect on 1st December in 2006, but said it's "highly unlikely" that the mistake impacted on any election results.
A spokeswoman added: "We have been assured that the error has been rectified and all wards have been re-checked.
"The electoral registration officer has apologised to the council and has written to the households affected and to the ward councillors involved, to make them aware of the situation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article