the UK Government is examining ways to restrict the access of EU migrants to benefits, but has stressed it would act within the law, Downing Street officials have made clear.
Prime Minister David Cameron wants to impose tougher conditions in the wake of work restrictions being lifted on Bulgaria and Romania from January 1.
One suggestion is extending the length of time new arrivals have to stay in Britain before they can claim benefits - from three months to a year.
Asked about reports that Mr Cameron was considering quadrupling the residency period, his spokesman said: "You would expect the Government to be looking at whether there is more that could be done. That process is, as you would expect, going on."
He stressed he was not in a position to say when a decision might be made or what changes might be introduced, noting: "I can't speculate about possible timings or measures."
But any idea the Government would seek to break international rules was rebuffed, with the spokesman insisting: "The Government acts within the law."
Yet any extension to the bar on benefits would potentially set up a clash with Brussels and a row within the Lib-Con Coalition. The European Commission prevents member states from discriminating between their own citizens and those from other EU member states.
Meanwhile, about 8000 Bulgarians could come to the UK when restrictions on their movement in the EU are lifted next year, according to the country's ambassador Konstantin Dimitrov.
He said last night they could not legally be denied access to labour markets once the controls were lifted in January. Asked about how many the UK could expect, he said: "Maybe 8000 immigrants a year judging on tendency for this year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article