The Kirk could help reduce the number of victims of abuse by offering sex offenders a role in congregations, the chief inspector of prisons in Scotland told church leaders yesterday.
The Very Rev Dr Andrew McLellan, a former Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland, told the annual meeting of Kirk commissioners that paedophiles are the worst prepared of all prisoners as they leave incarceration.
He told commissioners that helping such offenders return to the community, while also protecting people potentially at risk, is their duty.
Mr McLellan made the call as the Church spoke out after its prison chaplains were accused of acting as "agents for sex offenders" by attempting to aid their safe return to the community.
The Kirk made a furious attack on a tabloid newspaper after it claimed prison chaplains would "enlist paedophiles and abusers".
It came after a joint report from the Kirk's safeguarding and forgiveness and proportionality committees which seeks ways to help reform sex offenders once they leave prison.
Mr McLellan said: "I want the General Assembly to see any engagement with sex offenders not merely as a protection of the children of congregations but also as a contribution to public safety.Sex offenders get the worst preparation for release of any offenders in Scotland's prisons, despite the fact that they are those who the public would want to have the best preparation.
"Any small engagement which congregations can make, recognising the paramount responsibility for those children, to draw sex offenders into normal society and help them towards normal life is a significant and Christian responsibility to public safety and to reducing the number of victims.
"If in saying that, the Church of Scotland and the convener is attacked in scurrilous red-top newspapers then we should be proud of that."
Bill Taylor, the Church's Chaplaincy Advisor to the Scottish Prison Service, wrote in response to the newspaper report: "The suggestion that prison chaplains act as agents to enable sex offenders to continue their behaviour in the community is offensive in itself. Chaplains give tirelessly of their time to all prisoners, their families, prison staff, and all who are affected by crime."
Rev Peter Neilson, of the Ministries Council, who read an emotional message on behalf of an abused person, said there was disappointment that it was not recognised that abusers could be - and have been - ministers of the Kirk.
The victim, who was abused by a now-deceased minister, agreed it was better to reform in a supportive environment.
It was later included in the documents that it was recognised ministers could be sex offenders.
Earlier this month Neil Campbell, a 46-year-old married church elder from Glasgow, was among eight men who were convicted for their part in a paedophile ring. Campbell was convicted of possessing, making and distributing indecent images.
In 2003 a minister was suspended from the Kirk without limit of time for attempting to sexually assault a teenager in a hotel lavatory. Ian Andrew, then of St Andrews High Church in Musselburgh, was placed on the sex offenders register for five years and ordered to pay £200 compensation to the 14-year-old boy he admitted attempting to sexually assault.
Rev John Christie, convener of the joint working group on forgiveness and proportionality, said: "Covenants of Responsibilities will be drawn up to ensure that the particular circumstances of each sex offender are recognised and that the appropriate oversight and support are offered in congregations."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article