Steven Shingler was yesterday coming to terms with that fact that his prospects of representing the land of his mother's birth had become even more remote after the sport's global governing body upheld their ruling that the 20-year-old fly-half/centre is eligible only for Wales.
Last January, the Swansea-born Shingler was named in Scotland coach Andy Robinson's initial RBS 6 Nations squad, but it quickly emerged that the London Irish player had been tied to Wales through his participation in an Under-20 match against France last year.
Although Murrayfield officials contested the Welsh claim on the player, their appeal was thrown out at an International Rugby Board council meeting in Dublin.
An IRB statement said: "Council, having considered all the facts and having heard submissions from the SRU and WRU legal representatives, dismissed the appeal and upheld the decision of the IRB regulations committee.
"The council therefore determined that Steven Shingler is tied to Wales in accordance with IRB regulation 8 and therefore is ineligible to represent another union."
Shingler may now pursue his case through the courts – almost certainly in Ireland – but that process is likely to be long-winded. Worse still, he is now effectively in international limbo, as there is little chance that Wales will actually select him in the foreseeable future.
Robinson expressed sympathy for Shingler's predicament. "The SRU have backed Steven Shingler totally and believed there was a case there," said the coach. "I really now feel for the player. This was an important choice for him to make it at a young age and it's unfortunate that we've lost the case.
"It's down to Steven now. I spoke to him last night and he needs to take this in. He has to take stock now of the decision that's been made and take clear advice."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article