Amir Khan yesterday counted to 10 after saying he would announce "in due course" the name of the trainer he hopes will mastermind his route back to the top of boxing after a tumultuous few months.
The 25-year-old hinted he was about to make a fast-track decision on the identity of his new mentor after parting company with Freddie Roach, regarded by many as the best trainer in the business, in the wake of his defeats to Lamont Petersen and Danny Garcia.
The split was expected in the aftermath of the Bolton fighter's July 14 loss to Garcia which saw him lose his WBA and WBC light-welterweight titles. But, after announcing the news on his Twitter account, he then teased fans by saying he would reveal his next trainer in "10 minutes" before checking himself and altering that timescale to some indeterminate future point.
The former Olympic silver medallist thanked Roach for his services, but acknowledged a four-year partnership that at one time promised so much was now over. He wrote: "I feel now is the right time in my career to make a fresh change and bring in a new trainer. I'm looking forward to, and am excited, about the prospect of working alongside someone new. I will make an announcement in due course of who this will be."
Khan may well choose to be trained in England, meaning he will no longer have to make regular trips to Los Angeles or the Philippines, where Roach trains Manny Pacquiao, the world's best pound-for-found fighter.
He will also be looking for a fresh impetus given the backward steps he has taken over the last year. He lost to Petersen in Washington last December, although the result was eventually overturned owing to the American's failed drugs test, and was then sensationally stopped in the fourth round by the largely unknown Garcia when the pair met two months ago.
Khan said in the aftermath of that defeat that he was eager to remain with Roach, who is widely credited with getting Khan's career back on track following his surprise loss to Bredis Prescott in September 2008. A sticking point came, though, with Khan thought to want Roach to focus fully on him in pre-fight camps, rather than the rest of his stable. Roach admitted as much in his assessment of what had happened, telling ESPN.com: "He [Khan] said, 'I know you're busy with your other fighters and I'm going to go in a different direction'. He was being nice. I wished him luck. I've been fired before."
Khan now has to plot a redemptive route back on to the boxing ladder, but already a first rung has presented itself in the form of his friend Ricky Hatton who announced his ring comeback on Friday.
The 33-year-old former world light welterweight champion could face Khan in an all-British bout after announcing that he was ending a three-year exile from the ring after his last fight saw him knocked out by Pacquiao in their IBO title fight in Las Vegas.
Ironically, Hatton, too, will rely on a new cornerman and has picked Manchester-based Bob Shannon, who has guided his brother Matthew to a world title shot, to link up with him. The veteran trainer says he could see the desire in his friend's eyes from the moment they met.
"Everyone deserves a second chance," Shannon said. "He told me he wants to redeem himself for his son, his family and his fans. That's what I wanted to hear. It's now my job to get him back up there."
The Hitman has been plagued by well-publicised problems with drink and depression since officially hanging up his gloves in 2011 and yesterday he had other issues to contend with after it emerged his father was arrested for attacking him the day before he announced his comeback.
It is understood Hatton had to protect himself after his father Ray, 61, attacked him during a heated row in the car park outside his Manchester gym on Thursday morning. Police were called and Hatton senior was arrested and cautioned. The boxer was uninjured.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article