A damning report into Welsh regional rugby has questioned whether one or more of the four composite teams will survive amid the present financial downturn, and has criticised "poor management" at some of the organisations, most of whom are struggling with falling attendances and revenue, and are underperforming in the RaboDirect Pro12 competition.
Accountants, PriceWaterhouse-Coopers, assessed the financial situation of the four districts – Cardiff Blues, Newport-Gwent Dragons, Ospreys and Scarlets – up to April of this year, and highlighted a range of options, including disbanding these sides and handing back power to the clubs. That option was dismissed, in favour of the report's main recommendation of greater collaboration between the Welsh Rugby Union and the regions, which would be "enforced" by a new management board. But there is no guarantee that this will halt the malaise.
The news might come as a surprise, considering that the Principality have won three grand slams since 2005, and surged to the third of these in the most recent RBS 6 Nations. That success has not been replicated at regional level, though, where none of the Welsh sides have won the Heineken Cup, and have largely been superseded by their Irish counterparts in recent seasons.
Part of the reason for the decline lies in the lack of integrated management in one of the sport's heartlands. Despite rising income for the WRU, the regions' annual funding gap rose from £2m in 2008 to £5.2m in 2011. Although those figures may be small beer in football terms, rugby, even in Wales, is labouring to cling on to existing sponsorship and commercial deals.
The report says: "The historical financial performances show that the four regional businesses are not sustainable, on a stand-alone basis, in their current form."
It further paints a gloomy picture of rising dissatisfaction in the valleys over the way that the governing body has undermined the club game, some of which will be familiar to those who have followed events in Scotland since the advent of professionalism in 1995.
"We understand from regional representatives that the impact of the global financial crisis, together with benefactors becoming disillusioned with a relationship of conflict [with the WRU] has removed most or all of this support for the regional businesses. [They] could and should have been run in a more professional and commercial manner and poor decision-making has contributed to the size of the funding gap."
Essentially, the report has confirmed three key realities for the Welsh to mull over. First, they must now accept that they cannot compete financially with the richer French and English clubs and will have to cut their cloth accordingly.
Second, they cannot expect supporters to keep turning up at district level without a marked improvement in results, given the increasing number of expensive international fixtures being staged by the WRU in Cardiff. And third, that, irrespective of Wales' rich rugby heritage, four regions may be too many in a country which only has 1.5m people.
In that light, the report might sound a wake-up call. On the other hand, it may heighten fears about the long-term viability of a 12-team tournament, where the Welsh and Italians are toiling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article