Ally McCoist believes the Scottish Football Association should step into the debate about league reconstruction and take control of the process.
Both the Scottish Premier League and the Scottish Football League have drawn up restructure plans, but it is unlikely the two organisations will come to an agreement. The Rangers manager, however, insists it is the governing body's role to intervene.
The SFL clubs held a meeting last week to discuss their proposals, while the SPL clubs will do the same at their next gathering. At stake is maintaining two separate league bodies, or a merger. The questions of power and finance are the divisive points, rather than the structure of the leagues. Since consensus is unlikely, somebody will have to take a leading role.
"Contrary to what a lot of people might think, outwith our situation I would have been happy for reconstruction," McCoist said. "I looked at the SFL proposals – 16, 10 and 16 – and I don't have a problem with that. Generally speaking, there's a belief among the majority that change is required. We could do with freshening it up a little bit and I'm very hopeful. I think it will happen. You would hope the governing body would look after the game in the way they should. I'm of the opinion that the SFA have the power to do it and if it's to the benefit of the game then they should do it. [The SPL] has possibly gone a little bit stale."
The SPL are considering a 16-team top flight, or two top leagues of 12, both of which would involve inviting a number of clubs to resign from the SFL. Yet the mood amongst the lower league clubs is still influenced by the disagreements last summer over which division should accommodate Rangers.
Under the SFL's plans, play-offs would feature in all divisions and money would be distributed more evenly among all clubs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article