With every passing week I find it impossible to believe that Ally McCoist will be the manager of Rangers when the club finally crosses the threshold back into the top tier of Scottish football.
There is much to admire about McCoist, as a person and as a football man, and his legend-status among Rangers fans will prove untouchable.
But his gifts as a manager? His team's performances on the field are severely undermining his case.
There is always a knee-jerk reaction after defeats such as that suffered by Rangers against Dundee United on Saturday - this must be acknowledged. The knives are coming out for McCoist, who may well prove his growing army of critics wrong.
But the football evidence is mounting against him. I'm now concluding that McCoist's reign as Rangers manager will not survive the long journey back to the top flight in Scotland. On that road "home" I'll be amazed if he stays the course.
Rangers' current runaway lead at the top of the Third Division is next to irrelevant. What else is to be expected of a full-time club paying (relatively) lavish wages against regiments of part-timers?
"I would be concerned if we were not in a comfortable position in the league, because that is where we'll be judged," McCoist said in attempted mitigation after the 3-0 defeat on Tayside.
Well, I'm sorry, Ally, but where Rangers currently stand in the league is about the least of the factors involved.
Does McCoist's Rangers play an impressive style of football? Does the team look convincing? Do Rangers have the appearance of a well-managed, well-coached team?
The answer to all these questions appears to be "no".
Tannadice on Saturday, following months of patchy Rangers football, was one more glimpse of a team which looks poorly motivated and inspired. As United breezed to their 3-0 win, from a Rangers point of view it was difficult to spot what the strategy was to reclaim the match.
Aside from McCoist's strange desire to play just one out-and-out striker, debating his tactics quickly becomes a dull business – any talented and motivated team should be able to play in various systems and still attend to its business.
It is when a team's play is so porous and fragmented, as Rangers' was in Dundee, that people start to look at the manager.
This current Rangers team, with its smattering of SPL-class players, is an accurate reflection of what McCoist is about as a manager. And the message being conveyed is not good.
In McCoist's defence, you cannot over-estimate the importance of his role as Rangers have plunged into crisis. The 50-year-old has been a sheet-anchor at Ibrox, rallying supporters and, in part, saving Charles Green's skin early on in the drama.
The Rangers supporters severely doubted Green's intentions – until McCoist spoke up in the CEO's defence. Without McCoist, Green's Rangers intervention might have been stillborn.
This is all admirable and laudable. It is another reason why Ally McCoist will remain heroically etched in Rangers' history. But it is not football management.
Last weekend was the seventh successive cup competition, stretching back to July 2011, from which McCoist’s Rangers had been bounced in the early rounds. It is a pretty dire record.
For many Rangers supporters it is painful to criticise McCoist. After all, he was a magnificent striker for the club. His time as manager has also coincided with the club's lurch into administration and liquidation.
As if this weren't bad enough, McCoist had to follow Walter Smith, a pragmatist who seemed to have an antidote to any domestic mess Rangers found themselves in.
But at some stage, the sheer blasphemy of Rangers sacking Ally McCoist may have to come. It is something Charles Green has already considered, and may have to re-visit.
Green knows what it is like to be loathed in football – his time as CEO at Sheffield United taught him that. He would pull the trigger if need be, regardless of the "favourite son" involved.
I hope I'm wrong, and that Ally McCoist leads Rangers back into the SPL. But I can't see it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article