Michael Johnston has described claims that he demanded at least £1m for his Kilmarnock shareholding as "wholly inaccurate".
The chairman of the Rugby Park club has been under pressure from supporters and local businesses to cede control since sacking Kenny Shiels last month.
A group of companies who are keen to take the club out of Johnston's hands yesterday released a statement claiming that Johnston had asked for a seven-figure sum for the Ayrshire outfit, who have debts of almost £10m, despite having bought his stake for £1 in 2005, with predecessor Jamie Moffat then writing off half of a £1.8m loan to the club in 2010.
The Ayrshire Business Group released a statement through leader John Gall, managing director of Browning's the Bakers. It read: "One group member advised that Michael Johnston has formally intimated that a seven-figure sum, in addition to the settlement of Jamie Moffat's loan, is required for him to hand over control of the club.
"The group are astonished by Mr Johnston's valuation and shocked by his blatant profiteering. They have unanimously agreed any such investment would be better utilised directly in the club.
"The group reiterated their strong belief that Mr Johnston should only be entitled to the £1 he paid in 2005, and they reject the exorbitant price stated by Mr Johnston."
Johnston, the sole member of the club's board, rebutted the allegations. He said: "The statement from the group is wholly inaccurate. I have not made any proposal to anybody regarding the takeover of my shares or any loan to be repaid to Jamie Moffat. Following a meeting with Bill Costley [former chairman] last month, I told him I would be happy to meet with the Ayrshire group but I haven't heard from anyone."
The consortium of Ayrshire firms vowed to persevere in their bid to change the ownership.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article