IN the end, this was such a thumping that the scorer of two of Manchester City's goals even managed to forget the final result.
"It's not easy to win 5-0 at home against another Premier League team," Edin Dzeko said afterwards.
That may well be the case, but winning 6-0 certainly seemed easy enough, and City - helped by a hat trick by Alvaro Negredo - will surely be lining up at Wembley for the Capital One Cup final in March.
"We still have to play away," cautioned Dzeko. "But this will give us the confidence for the second leg. The first goal is always important, then maybe we can open them up because they were defending with eight, nine players always."
Yaya Toure was also on the scoresheet as City piled on the misery for Sam Allardyce, the under-fire West Ham United manager.
The hosts needed just 12 minutes to take the lead at the Etihad Stadium as the Londoners were swept aside in an embarrassingly one-sided match.
Allardyce, who was taunted by visiting fans late in the game, had prioritised the match by fielding a weakened side against Nottingham Forest in the FA Cup last weekend.
But it was quickly evident that the strategy had backfired as they were thrashed by six goals, and despite eight changes - including the return of senior players such as Mark Noble, Joe Cole, Guy Demel and Mohamed Diame - they slumped to a similar defeat in the Manchester rain.
It was also a particularly chastening debut for Roger Johnson, who looked well off the pace after arriving on loan from Wolves this week to apparently bolster the defence.
For the hosts, it was another irresistible display to add to a growing catalogue that has already seen them put six past Arsenal and Tottenham and score seven against Norwich at home this season.
In truth, they might even have had more but for a number of good saves from West Ham goalkeeper Adrian.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article