STUART McCALL, the Motherwell manager, hit out yesterday at a little-known Scottish Professional Football League rule which stopped him sending a player out on loan and jeopardised the club's prospects of signing forward Henri Anier on a permanent contract.
The rule - which was brought into effect when the Scottish Premier League and Scottish Football League merged last summer and was not highlighted to clubs - means that a club can now only send one player out to each side in the league system.
Although Motherwell managed to complete the signing of Estonian striker Anier last night, McCall was furious that much of the club's work over the past week could have been for nothing. The Fir Park club had freed up money to offer erstwhile loanee Anier - his short-term spell from Viking Stavanger was to expire after today's match at Hearts - a permanent deal and had balanced the budget by arranging to send a second player to Dundee, to join Adam Cummins on loan.
That loan arrangement, as well as the deal for Anier, was about to be rubber-stamped when McCall was informed by an agent that it would not be possible.
"I'm flabbergasted, annoyed and stunned," admitted McCall, before Anier was signed belatedly. "Dundee didn't know. They came to me, and said 'can we take the two of them?' I didn't even think about it. We're trying to develop our young boys, bring them through and help them. You know what it's like with young boys, you want to go with your pal if you want, share the digs, the expenses, whatever it is.
"I got a text from an agent last night, to flag it up, because he'd heard of another manager trying it in the lower levels not long ago. Now, why it wasn't flagged up to anyone then?"
Last season's SPL rulebook stated that only one player could be loaned out to each top-flight side, a law put in place to stop richer teams bolstering their rivals with a group of players who would not be able to play against their parent club, therefore giving them an advantage. SFL rules, which were designed to span three divisions, were less stringent.
But rather than create an adaption of the two variations,
the new body chose instead to continue with the SPL version, which has no allowance for more than one player moving between leagues to the same club.
"This rule of [loaning only]
one player to a club, certainly when you go lower down the leagues, it's insane, it's crazy," said McCall. "We didn't even give it a thought, because you look
at Dunfermline, having three Dundee United players, you look at St Mirren having two from Newcastle. You wouldn't even think there was a change."
It was reported on Thursday that Dunfermline will escape punishment for breaching the rule, as they were unaware of the change to regulations - and were not informed when registering the players - when those loan deals were organised. St Mirren's later acquisition of two Newcastle players, on the other hand,
is apparently legal since cross-country arrangements are tackled under FIFA regulations, rather than the SPFL.
"When you go to referees' meetings at the beginning of the season, we don't go through every rule, but we go through rules that have been changed," said McCall. "So why hasn't this been flagged up? And why can Newcastle send two to St Mirren? It's barking mad."
McCall and Motherwell
will raise the issue at an SPFL meeting at Hampden on Monday, and while SPFL officials are believed to recognise that the rule should be changed, it is unlikely that any amendment will be made in time to conduct business during this transfer window.
Anier, meanwhile, was delighted to have eventually signed on at Fir Park. "I am really happy things are tied up and my long-term future is sorted out," said the striker.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article