FIFA president Sepp Blatter claims both the World Cup and the winter Olympics in Sochi have been "misused" as a platform for political protest.
Blatter insists those calling for a boycott of the Olympics because of human rights issues - the broadcaster Stephen Fry has backed a boycott over Russia's anti-gay laws - will achieve nothing.
FIFA is also facing up to the prospect of widespread protests at this summer's World Cup in Brazil after last year's warm-up tournament, the Confederations Cup, was targeted by mass demonstrations.
Blatter, who is also an International Olympic Committee member, said in his column in FIFA weekly: "2014 marks a year of celebration in the sporting world, with the Winter Olympics in Sochi in February followed by the football World Cup in Brazil this summer.
"These two events have one thing in common: they have both been misused as a platform for political disputes, and in the case of the Winter Olympics, this dispute is coming to a head with threats to boycott the Games.
"Such a boycott would change nothing. On the contrary, it may be interpreted as a refusal to establish a dialogue on the issue, as was the case with boycotts of the Olympic Games in Moscow in 1980 or in Los Angeles in 1984."
Russia is also hosting the 2018 World Cup and Blatter said he is sure "unpleasant issues" would be raised during the Olympics, which was why it was important to go to Sochi. The stadium for the opening ceremony is also a host venue for 2018.
He added: "I believe that such a major event presents a perfect opportunity to strike up conversations and cultivate contacts.
"It is also likely that unpleasant issues will be addressed, because FIFA's fight against discrimination does not end with the anti-racism campaign.
"We must fight every form of social exclusion.
"Anyone who decides to boycott the winter Olympics in Sochi will be surrendering on this important issue, just as anyone running away from a problem will never be able to resolve it. This reason alone is why it is important for me to travel to Russia."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article