Manchester United endured a nightmare penalty shoot-out as Sunderland claimed a place in the Capital One Cup final at Old Trafford.
United scored just once from their five kicks, with only skipper Darren Fletcher converting, as Sunderland's two successes proved enough to book a Wembley date with Manchester City on March 2.
In a season of utter misery for United boss David Moyes, it was yet another hammer blow.
His side has seemed to be on the verge of victory thanks to Jonny Evans' first-half goal as the tie ticked towards the final minute of extra time.
But when Phil Bardsley let fly from 20 yards, David de Gea inexplicably allowed the former United man's shot to slip through his grasp.
Amazingly, United earned themselves a reprieve in injury time as his players summoned up the spirit for which they are so famed and with virtually their last attack, Adnan Januzaj crossed for Javier Hernandez to bundle home from close range.
Moyes might have hoped fortune was to smile on him.
Even in a ridiculously bad shoot-out, De Gea's save from Adam Johnson meant Sunderland had only scored twice.
United could not match it though. And whilst it is anticipated Juan Mata will be having a medical tomorrow ahead of a club-record transfer from Chelsea, he will do so against a backdrop of even more gloom.
Sunderland boss Gus Poyet dedicated his side's dramatic win to the club's long-suffering fans.
"The feelings are for them," Poyet told Sky Sports 1, pointing to the visiting fans at Old Trafford
"A difficult season, nothing to enjoy, look at them, they deserve that. Let's see if we can go one more and win it."
Sunderland will be rank underdogs in the final against Manchester City, but, having knocked out Chelsea and now United, that is a status Poyet is happy with.
And asked if his side could win, the Uruguayan added: "No doubt, for sure."
Sunderland goalkeeper Vito Mannone, who saved the decisive penalty from Rafael, said: "Unbelievable, just unbelievable. I just want to celebrate with my team-mates.
"We deserved to get to the final."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article