The Rangers Supporters Trust has announced it now holds over half a million shares in the Ibrox club after buying a further 200,000 this week.
The fan group's long-term ambition is to hand control of Ibrox to the supporters, and they now hold 557,856 shares after spending £52,000 donated by fans using the BuyRangers direct debit scheme to make their latest investment. However, their stake still only equates to 0.86% of the SPFL League 1 leaders' total shareholding, and Trust chairman Gordon Dinnie admits ownership is a long way off.
"There is still a long way to go," he acknowledged. "We started our direct debit scheme just before Christmas. If we can get enough interest going in that then we can buy shares on a monthly basis and build up our stake. We can also borrow against that money coming in and use it to buy more. However, the big issue is availability of the shares. With the current price being so low, when you try to buy them on the market, folk are asking for a few pence more.
"But we don't need to aim for anything like a 50% stake in the club. Because of the fractious nature of the shareholding, a 10% stake could give you a major say in how the club is run. James Easdale had just one more share in the club than the RST following the IPO [initial public offering], yet he was appointed to the board.
"If we get to 5%, we would hold the right to call an agm, and the things you are able to do increases as your stake goes up from that point.
"If we can generate enough interest then hopefully we can then look towards taking our holding past 1%, then five, then as our stake grows we can think about getting a director on to the board of the club that has been elected by the fans."
The RST invested £250,000 into Rangers when it was floated on the stock market in December 2012. The shares were then priced at 70p each, but the off-field turmoil surrounding the club since has seen that price fall to just 25.75p per share.
The RST was able to buy its latest tranche at 26p per share after negotiating the seller down from 29p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article