CELTIC manager Neil Lennon has criticised Peter Shilton for saying Fraser Forster should leave Scottish football for the sake of his long-term England prospects.
Forster is unsure whether he will be one of the three goalkeepers in Roy Hodgson's squad for the World Cup finals in Brazil this summer. Joe Hart appears a certain pick and Forster, Ben Foster and John Ruddy should contest the other two places. Forster has been in the England squad 11 times and was capped once, against Chile at Wembley in November.
Shilton, who was capped 125 times by England, voiced a widely held perception south of the border when he said that Forster is not properly tested in Scottish football and is "just standing between the sticks for Celtic and having very little to do".
But Lennon, who was yesterday named SPFL Premiership manager of the month for January, thought that a lazy assessment by the retired 64-year-old. "How does Peter Shilton know? How often has Peter watched Celtic play? These comments do the player an injustice and are really unfair on Fraser. We know what a good goalkeeper he is and I think he has done enough to warrant a place on the 'plane to Brazil.
"I don't know if he's seen Fraser play live or if he's been to any games here. If he had been here over the past two or three months then he might change his mind. It sounds like a throwaway remark but sometimes those are the ones that can do the most damage. Peter was one of the world's best and had such a prolonged career with England but remarks like that are certainly not encouraging for Fraser. I don't think people should take much notice."
Lennon, however, has previously conceded that Forster is likely to leave Celtic in the summer, when he is all but certain to be a target for clubs in the Barclays Premier League.
Hodgson will list a provisional, 30-man squad for Brazil on May 13. Lennon's hunch is that the 25-year-old will be one of Hodgson's picks. "I think Fraser will go to Brazil. I haven't been given a heads-up on it but he's certainly within the top three English goalkeepers," Lennon said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article