Manchester City's FA Cup quarter-final against Wigan has been pushed back to Sunday, March 9, just three days before they bid to recover a first-leg Champions League deficit away to Barcelona.
The decision is unlikely to do much to improve the mood of City manager Manuel Pellegrini. The Chilean was left fuming after his side's 2-0 defeat at the Etihad Stadium to Barca on Tuesday, with Swedish referee Jonas Eriksson the main target of his ire.
Just three days ahead of the return at the Nou Camp, it has now been confirmed City will face holders Wigan in a re-run of the 2013 FA Cup final, with a 4pm kick-off at the Etihad.
Even programme hosts BT recognises its scheduling is tight for City, stating the game "will fall just days before...the crucial second leg" with the Spanish champions.
City's run of cup games next month begins with the Capital One Cup final against Sunderland on Sunday, March 2.
Following a clash at home to Stoke this Saturday, City do not face another league game for three weeks as their cup commitments kick in.
It is the price Pellegrini's side are paying for attacking trophies on four fronts, although their Champions League hopes look set to fall at the first knockout hurdle.
Despite Pellegrini's rant against Eriksson, claiming he lacked "impartiality", the man whose dismissal played a key role in City's demise does not feel the referee should shoulder the responsibility.
With the game evenly poised, Argentinian defender Martin Demichelis was sent off early in the second half for a challenge on compatriot Lionel Messi that resulted in the latter scoring the opener from the penalty spot.
Assessing the incident, Demichelis said: "I tackled him (Messi) because we were still outside the box.
"But I don't blame the referee. It happened all too fast. I have seen the moment again on TV and think 'Why did I have to tackle him and not keep running by his side?'
"I was sure I would get the ball when I made the tackle. And then you think that you will steal the ball from Messi, you realise that you don't. But I made the foul."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article