C IS FOR CURITIBA
C IS FOR CURITIBA
EVERY looming major event seems to have at least one construction crisis and, in the case of Brazil 2014, the stadium in question is the Arena da Baixada in the city of Curitiba in the southern province of Parana.
So concerned were Fifa about the lack of progress and slippage of deadlines surrounding the project last month that secretary general Jerome Valcke threatened to throw them off the bill completely, putting the city of Porto Alegre, about 400 miles away, on standby.
But with host side Atletico Paranaense belatedly throwing extra construction staff at the site to accelerate the pace, Valcke declared himself satisfied, while throwing in one qualification.
"It's a race against a very tight time line," Valcke said.
"Collective effort by all stakeholders involved in Curitiba must continue at highest pace."
Assuming everything goes to plan, four matches in total will take place at the Curitiba stadium, which is being expanded to a capacity of 43,900.
The Group F tie between Iran and Nigeria on June 16 is the tournament's first outing, with reigning champions Spain's Group B meeting with Australia on June 23 topping the bill ahead of Honduras v Ecuador in Group E and Algeria v Russia in Group H.
As it so happens, the Arena da Baixada was only one of six venues to miss an initial December 31 deadline, but problems deepened when it emerged that a fire there in October had done structural damage, despite promises by state officials that the impact was minor.
A report by the Public Ministry warned that the blaze "could have compromised the overall stability of the construction" and building work was formally suspended that month on the orders of a labour tribunal due to numerous safety breaches.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article