Cammy Bell has backed Rangers to put their Albion Rovers disappointment behind them and claim the win against Airdrie that would clinch the Scottish League One Title.
The Light Blues were forced to battle for a 1-1 draw in the William Hill Scottish Cup tie at the weekend after the Coatbridge men took a shock lead at Ibrox.
Both sides will do it all again in Monday's replay as they fight for the right to face Dundee United in the last four.
But, right now, Rangers are focused on delivering the goods in Wednesday's game against Airdrie to claim the championship crown.
Goalkeeper Bell said: "We are always disappointed if we don't win games. That's just Rangers Football Club.
"We just need to pick ourselves up, which we have done before.
"We have drawn a couple of games this season so we will pick ourselves up and move on to the game against Airdrie.
"You want to win it with style but I would always take a result over the style of football.
"At the end of the day results matter and that's what takes you places and wins you things. We are focused on getting the result.
"I've never won a title before so it will be a great occasion if we do it on Wednesday."
One of the major talking points following the draw with Rovers was whether Bilel Mohsni's controversial equaliser should have been allowed to stand amid claims goalkeeper Neil Parry was fouled.
Asked for his own thoughts, Gers number one Bell said: "I think I would have done things differently as a goalkeeper to be honest.
"You've got to protect yourself. You've got the licence to bring your leg up and protect yourself.
"It's a contact sport. You're going to get a little nudge and it depends how much the referee sees it as being a foul or not.
"He didn't see it as a foul, it was a goal and one that we gratefully accepted."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article