Ally McCoist last night questioned the timing of Dundee United's public attempt to have a potential William Hill Scottish Cup semi-final against Rangers moved away from Ibrox.
Stephen Thompson, the United chairman, said over the weekend that he had failed to convince the Scottish Football Association to select an alternative venue should the Ibrox side overcome Albion Rovers in tonight's quarter-final replay at New Douglas Park, while levelling strong criticism at the governing body for putting commercial interests ahead of "sporting integrity".
However, McCoist has since queried why Thompson did not raise his concerns about Ibrox being chosen as the venue for the semi-finals when the decision was taken in October rather than waiting until last Sunday's draw.
"I find the timing of it slightly unusual," said the Rangers manager. "I think they could maybe have complained when the decision was made, so that has surprised me, but I am not going to get involved in any squabbles with Dundee United again.
"I'll take the fifth on that one and keep my mouth shut. I'm obviously very hopeful we will be able to play them out there [at Ibrox]. What an incentive it is to possibly have a semi-final here against United."
Nicky Clark, the Rangers striker, did admit that playing at the club's home stadium in front of a partisan crowd would be a definite advantage for his side, should they progress from their replay. United had hoped to receive 20,000 tickets for the semi-final on April 12, but are in line to be given just 13,100 of Ibrox's 51,082 capacity should Rangers win this evening and reach the last four.
"It was decided it would be played here," said Clark. "We never picked that. We would have played them anywhere, but it just happens to be here and it looks like we'll just need to get on with it.
"If we get to the semis, I'm sure we'll raise our game again, especially if it's at Ibrox with the fans behind us. It will be a great occasion for us. This place would be bouncing and we'd be right up for it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article