Alan McManus has advised the sport's new generation to ditch social media and knuckle down, after rolling back the years to defeat his compatriot John Higgins, the four-time world champion, yesterday.
McManus, 43, had not won a match at the World Championships since he beat Ken Doherty in the last 16 in 2005, but he will now face the 44-year-old, another former Crucible winner, at the same stage on Friday.
He secured that appointment with Doherty by beating his long-time friend Higgins in a tight battle on Tuesday, snuffing out the Wishaw man's mini-revival in the second session to complete a 10-7 victory.
The Glaswegian they call Angles - for his precise style of play - believes that younger players should start following the example of the old guard to prolong their careers at the very highest level of the game.
"I think there's still plenty of room for guys over 40, 42 - whatever it is - to compete at the higher level of the game," said the world No.35. "I also think the older players have stolen a march on today's young brigade. Today's world isn't good for young people in snooker terms because they spend all their time on Facebook and it's killing their snooker.
"I've seen it, they're too busy reading and writing about snooker instead of getting their nut down. I'm on Twitter but don't post messages very often: only for fun. It's just my personal opinion. Not all of them do it but some of them are spending too much time on the internet."
Of Friday's prospects, he said: "I'm pleased for Ken; we play a similar type of game. I've always enjoyed watching him and he did really well in qualifying last week; we've had similar stories coming through [qualifying ties]. I remember the last time I played Ken here; I think it was 13-11. It was a really good match; hopefully we'll have something similar."
Higgins had won the last three frames in the first session to head into yesterday's second session with the momentum, but poor positional play initially blighted his comeback attempt and his position looked hopeless as he fell 9-4 adrift.
However, the world No.9 rallied to pull it back to 9-7 - he had a match-high break of 111 - before missing a crucial blue in the 17th frame to open the way for McManus to triumph.
"I scraped over the line in the end; I said to my pal at the break that John's going to come on strong here; it's what he does," added McManus. "It was no surprise, if John starts relaxing and putting his arm through the white the way he can do it's like trying to tame a lion at times. Any time for me to even practise with John is just a thrill frankly. I hold him in such high esteem as a guy and a player; he's a legend of the sport."
Higgins, the 38-year-old former winner, has struggled to find his best form since his last World Championship success in 2011 but, while he admits he may never reach those heady heights again, he is adamant there is plenty left in the tank.
"There have been times I've sat here desolate, thinking there's nothing at the end of the tunnel but I definitely think I've got some decent snooker left in me," he said. "I might not be one of the top players you think of challenging for every event - I'm possibly a journeyman top-16 player now - but every journeyman can have his day sometimes."
Of the finish, he said: "I had to play [the last blue] really thin because I knew it would have cannoned into the brown, and I just took my eye off it. Alan then cleared up and it was disappointing the way it finished because I was playing pretty well."
Higgins refused to rule out his fellow-countryman against Doherty either. "Alan played three matches just last week and has Ken next - that's going to be a battle and they've had great battles. I've got a lot of respect for Alan and people such as Stephen [Hendry] because if it hadn't been for practising with them when I was younger I wouldn't have become the player I am today."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article