Richard Bevan, chief executive of the League Managers' Association, has criticised the manner in which David Moyes was sacked as manager of Manchester United.
The Scot was removed form his post on Tuesday but the LMA have derided the whole affair as "unprofessional".
Their discontent is rooted in the fact that reports that Moyes was to be dismissed had emerged 16 hours before the coach had been called into a meeting with United's executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward to be informed that his contract was being terminated. The insinuation is that United officials had leaked their intentions to the press first, although officials at Old Trafford have since denied such an accusation.
They claim instead that no official decision had been taken at the time the reports came out on Monday but that has not been enough to appease the LMA.
"The LMA is very disappointed with the nature of David's departure from Manchester United and to read extensive reports in the press, confirming David's sacking, before David himself had been spoken to officially by the club," said Bevan.
"Throughout his time at United, David, as he always does, has conducted himself with integrity and professionalism, values that he believes in and that have been strongly associated with the club and its rich tradition. It is therefore sad to see the end of David's tenure at United handled in an unprofessional manner."
The 50-year-old was castigated during the final months of his reign but Bevan is certain that Moyes will rebuild his reputation quickly. "He is passionate about the game and he possesses the drive and resilience to learn from this chapter of his career and move on to a new challenge in the game," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article