RANGERS chief executive Graham Wallace will sit down with manager Ally McCoist tomorrow morning in an attempt to reassure him that he can provide the tools he requires to take the club out of the Championship at the first time of asking.
McCoist will be told the playing budget for next season is comparable to his current wage bill, while the threat of supporters withholding season ticket monies could be offset by a potential windfall of up to £8 million from a contingency plan to offer 43.4 million ordinary shares to existing shareholders.
McCoist said last night he would reserve judgment until he sees the fine detail of what Wallace is proposing. Although the release of Emilson Cribari should free up around £7000 in weekly wages to finance signing targets such as Kris Boyd and Kenny Miller, the Rangers manager pointedly insisted on the need to "strengthen the squad" for next season and refused to answer questions about the proposed creation of the post of chief football operations officer, apparently envisaged to head up the club's long-term recruitment policy.
"I wouldn't say I am encouraged or that I am not encouraged," said McCoist. "I wouldn't go that far, I will just wait and see until I am fully told.
"I have had a brief indication that [the budget] won't be too dissimilar to this year so straight away that tells me that we can perhaps juggle about and make one or two changes here and there."
For his part, Wallace warmly praised his manager, and insisted the new post was very much a supporting role. "I never even had a thought about the manager's future," said Wallace.
"He's been extremely supportive in terms of understanding that some of the tools you'd expect him to have, he hasn't had. He's obviously interested in the financial budget. He knows we're going to make funds available for the summer, but doesn't know the magnitude, the number.
"We will sit down over the weekend and agree that. The football operations officer is very much a support role.
"The hunt for this person begins now and it's about getting the right person."
l Peace in our time? Pages 2-3
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article