DANNY LENNON believes opposition managers and players are using Jim Goodwin's reputation against him after St Mirren successfully appealed the red card shown to their captain in last month's match against Hibernian.
The Irishman was sent off by referee Kevin Clancy for a challenge on Kevin Thomson in the first half of the game, despite appearing to make only minimal contact with the Hibs midfielder.
A Scottish Football Association disciplinary panel yesterday agreed, downgrading Goodwin's sending off for "serious foul play" to a booking for "recklessly dangerous play".
The 32 year-old played in the draw against Partick Thistle last Friday night pending his appeal and will now also be free to face Ross County tomorrow in a crucial match in the battle to avoid the relegation play-off place. The Paisley side sit seventh in the SPFL Premiership table but are only two points ahead of 11th with three matches of the season left.
Goodwin was issued with a two-game ban in late December after being caught on camera striking Dundee United's Stuart Armstrong with his arm and Lennon believes opposition figures are now looking to capitalise on his player's reputation.
"I certainly feel it's the right decision [to overturn the red card]." said Lennon. "I believe that things with Jim since his retrospective ban from Boxing Day have been blown all out of proportion.
"He's a great player and a great guy, and we need people like Jim in our game. Unfortunately players and managers have tried to use that situation to create an unfair reputation for Jim and gain an unfair advantage in matches. They know what qualities he has and that he's a big player for us. That's the ugly side of the beautiful game."
Lennon has spoken to Goodwin to make sure he doesn't give referees any reason to take action. "That's the whole-heartedness of the player. He lives and dies by the sword. There was a hefty challenge on him in the game against Thistle last week but he accepts that. You never see him complaining. But he knows when he has to temper things. When he stays on his feet he stays in control. With other managers and players trying to put referees under pressure, we ask Jim not to put himself into any of those types of positions."
St Mirren go into tomorrow's contest against County in good form, undefeated in their last four outings. A victory, combined with certain other results, would effectively ensure their safety but Lennon wasn't of a mind to start looking too far ahead. "Only two points separates the five teams and it's very exciting. We've won and drawn our last two games which has seen us go from 10th to 7th. That shows you how fine the margins are in the bottom half of the table. We've hit decent form and we're just ahead at this moment in time. But to continue that and get over the line, we must keep showing our key strengths."
The long-term future at St Mirren is even more uncertain, with Lennon among a number of figures whose contracts are set to expire at the end of the month. A decision has been taken to put those matters on to the back burner until the season is concluded although Lennon conceded that there will be a number of players whose performances - and their imminent availability - will have attracted potential suitors.
One who falls into that category is Kenny McLean. The midfielder has endured an up-and-down season but has scored in St Mirren's last three matches. With his deal set to expire, a number of clubs have expressed an interest in him, with Lennon labelling the chances of St Mirren holding on to the 22 year-old as "slim".
"We are realists." said Lennon. I certainly know that if I was the manager of another football club he would be a player very much on my radar. Kenny can go all the way in the game."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article