REPUBLIC of Ireland manager Martin O'Neill has said he would not stand in Roy Keane's way if his assistant was offered the chance to take over at Celtic.
O'Neill admitted Keane would be a loss to the national side but said he was relaxed about the speculation linking the former Manchester United star with the Parkhead job - at least for now.
"I would say that Roy would make a good manager; I have always said that about Roy," O'Neill said. "I think the experiences he has had at Sunderland and Ipswich will stand him in good stead.
"He had this opportunity to come with me as my assistant here but I have often said that he will be a manager again.
"I think this role is good for him. It gives him a chance to look at it, maybe work with somebody with a bit of experience like myself. But he will become a manager again, there's no question about it."
O'Neill added: "Naturally, having brought him in, I'd be disappointed if he went but I wouldn't really be standing in his way in that sense.
"I'd speak to him, I'd speak to [FAI chief executive] John Delaney as well if it happened, but it is honestly pure speculation at this minute.
"It doesn't bother me too much at all - or at least I am trying to show that."
Keane was not being quoted for club posts at the time Celtic majority shareholder Dermont Desmond brokered an unlikely partnership between him and O'Neill when a replacement for Giovanni Trapattoni was being sought. But O'Neill has no problem with the fact Keane's name appears to be back in the spotlight.
O'Neill said: "When I took him on, I can't say I had really thought that particular element of it through. It wasn't top of list at the time because he wasn't being mentioned for jobs, but such is his profile I probably should have expected it.
"He was linked also as assistant to [Louis] Van Gaal at Manchester United, he is being linked everywhere. It genuinely isn't a problem to me.
"Obviously it may well be when he is actually asked about for a specific managerial job. I will deal with that when it comes, if it comes. Henrik Larsson was nailed on for [the Celtic job], and then suddenly he was nailed off again, so I don't know how serious any of it is."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article