The last two women to win the French Open before Serena Williams share an agent, a common foe in the American and a huge desire to get their title back.
Maria Sharapova, winner in 2012, and Li Na, the champion in 2011, have both come off second-best against Williams more often than not, bludgeoned by the sheer power - of the mind and body - of the world No 1.
It is 10 years since Sharapova last beat Williams but the Russian still believes there is more joy around the corner. "I want to achieve more, I want to win more Grand Slams and I want to get back to No 1," said Sharapova, who won the title in Stuttgart last month.
"I think when you have that feeling of being there before and holding those trophies, they are so memorable. You spend so many hours training to feel that excitement, to feel that energy, that adrenaline for those moments of match-point victories. That's why I [still] play, because that's what I've known for my whole life. And my body still allows me to do that. I have done it since I was a very young girl. I love the thrill of it. I don't think there is anything else that would give me that much satisfaction in what I do."
Ten years after she won Wimbledon, it is arguable that the woman who off the court has become a brand in her own right, has transformed herself on clay, too, to the point where it could almost be considered her best surface.
"I don't know about that," she said. "I don't like to say any is my favourite. I feel like I've evolved on it. Clay was very different because I was always physically challenged on it, I never thought I could stand those long matches and have the strength to come back the next day.
"It's a learning process because you have so much more time to see point construction, to see the game and to understand it. I really enjoy that. I've always liked to have hitting partners to challenge me to hit an extra ball, and that's helped me a lot in recent years I think."
Li, like Sharapova, never believed clay was a surface she could win on and yet her first Grand Slam title came in Paris. Feted by the millions of people watching back home in China, it took her some time to cope with the adulation of a nation and her results were inconsistent for much of the following year.
But since teaming up with Carlos Rodriguez, the former coach of Justine Henin, Li has gone up another level and victory in the Australian Open at the start of the year gave her a second Grand Slam title.
"I never thought I could win on clay," Li laughed. "Hard courts yes, but not clay. But then I did. When I won in Paris, I don't think people could believe it. But when I won in Australia, they knew that I could, so that was better."
Since winning in Melbourne, Li has been playing consistently good tennis and at the age of 32, she remains one of the best athletes on Tour.
"I think my chances here are good," Li said, with a smile. "I am playing well. I am always trying to be consistent and it's good."
There will be British interest in the women's singles after Heather Watson's crushing victory over Anett Kontaveit in the final round of qualify- ing yesterday. The British No 2 needed just 48 minutes to defeat 18-year-old Estonian Kontaveit 6-1, 6-1, making . it eight victories in a row.
While things have been going well on the court, it has been a poignant week off it for all associated with British tennis after Monday's funeral of Elena Baltacha. Watson was a Fed Cup team-mate of the former British No 1, who died from liver cancer this month. The 22-year-old said: "It's so sad. I'm just using it as motivation that life is short, you don't know when it's going to be your last so just make the most of every day. She was so feisty on the court. I can picture her now saying, 'Come on'. I just can't believe she's not here any more."
Watson has a winnable first-round match against Czech world No 63 Barbora Zahlavova Strycova, although fourth seed Simona Halep is likely to lie in wait for the winner.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article