THE anarchy is over.
Order has been restored at the All England Club. Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer, those two grand rivals of men's tennis, with a combined 31 grand slam titles between them, are through to the second round of Wimbledon.
That such a mundane achievement can be spoken of in such stark terms says it all about the seismic shocks experienced by both during last year's championships. By this stage 12 months back, you will recall, the Spaniard had crashed out to World No.135 Steve Darcis, while Federer was blissfully unaware of the variation on that same fate which awaited him in the second round against World No.116 Sergiy Stakhovsky.
You only had to watch Nadal cavorting around in joy and relief after his 4-6, 6-3, 6-3, 6-3 victory over Martin Klizan to appreciate how much grass courts have conspired against the Mallorcan in recent times. While the 28-year-old's hard-fought victory against the Slovak was his 700th tour level match win, it was also his first on this surface since 2012.
For all the mastery of the play which has brought Nadal back to No.1 in the world, damaging defeats to Lukas Rosol - more on him later - Darcis, and Dustin Brown at Halle last month have left him questioning his ability to adjust to the lawns of London. By next year, the grass-court season will be extended an extra week to accommodate him.
Encountering Klizan, a top-30 player as recently as March last year, always appeared to be a testing assignment at the first time of asking. And so it proved. The Slovak is a man who also possesses the distinction of taking the first set from Nadal at Roland Garros last year in an identical scoreline and when he broke the Nadal serve in the ninth game of the first set, serving it out from 0-30, it was to a soundtrack of gasps from the Centre Court crowd.
But Nadal circa 2014 has noticeably more confidence in that knee, and consequently more practice under his belt. Some swashbuckling play saw him break the Klizan serve in the sixth game of the second set, enduring a deuce as he served out to level matters at one set all.
Neither man's serve was entirely safe from then on, Klizan taking three of 13 break points, and Nadal marginally better with six of 15. Neither was there much to separate them when it came to unforced errors, but in just shy of three hours the Spaniard's first-serve percentage held up slightly better. Even still, the Nadal who won here in 2008 and 2010 might have felt slightly embarrassed by spending so much energy celebrating a first-round victory.
Both of those years saw the Spaniard complete the Roland Garros-Wimbledon double, an achievement which is widely regarded as one of the hardest in any sport. Only Rod Laver, Bjorn Borg and Roger Federer have also managed it but Nadal clearly feels it is not so bad. "I don't see a big difference between winning Roland Garros and Wimbledon because in the end even if you are in the final, you really make the same adjustment," he said. "[Novak] Djokovic was able to play the final in Roland Garros or semi-finals and then win here."
Yet for all his joy, Nadal may have left SW19 yesterday feeling this tournament is mocking him. Next up, after all, for the Spaniard is a certain Mr Rosol. "I lost because he's a good player," the Spaniard recalled of their 2012 encounter. "He's a player that can play very well on this surface. He's aggressive and it will be a tough match again. I will need to play very well."
By contrast, Federer's assignment against Paolo Lorenzi of Italy on Court No.1 always appeared likely to be a stroll in the park. The Italian has reached the age of 32 without winning a single grand slam match in 13 major appearances, his three tour level grass-court wins dwarfed by Federer's 125. While the Swiss had to save five break points in the first set, he none the less had a 6-1, 6-1, 6-3 win wrapped up in 1hr 33mins. "Many times when I played my first round on Court No.1, I went on to play really well here," said Federer. "Let's hope it's another really good year for me."
Federer was not the only high-profile Swiss player yesterday defying a habit of early defeats. Stanislas Wawrinka's 6-3, 6-4, 6-3 victory over Joao Sousa of Portugal was the first time he had made it to the second round since 2011.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article