BRAZIL have brushed off claims in the Chilean media that English referee Howard Webb might favour the hosts in the all-south American showdown in Belo Horizonte today.
Webb was also the man in charge when Brazil beat Chile 3-0 at the same stage of the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. There was no controversy in that game - in fact the only criticism of Webb was that he might have awarded Brazil a penalty - but none the less media outlets in Chile fear the hosts will get an easy ride.
That feeling has been doing the rounds since the opening match of the tournament against Brazil when the hosts were awarded a penalty by Japanese official Yuichi Nishimura for what was a blatant dive by Fred.
Brazil team spokesman Rodrigo Paiva said any such suggestions were disrespectful and "immature".
He said: "This kind of pressure I think is ridiculous. Brazil don't need a referee to win the match and you should respect a little bit more the Brazilian national team and the Brazilian people."
Meanwhile, Luiz Felipe Scolari, the coach, is under growing pressure to pick Fernandinho in his starting line-up. Scolari's side looked unconvincing in long spells in their Group A games, but their best period came in the second half of the 4-1 win over Cameroon when Fernandinho was sent on - he scored and created another - for Tottenham's Paulinho.
"I've always dreamed of playing in the World Cup and wearing the Selecao jersey, but I knew how difficult that was, what with me playing in Ukraine for Shakhtar," said the Manchester City player.
"Last year, though, when I moved to England and began playing in a much bigger league with a much higher profile, I could see things coming together for me.
"I fought hard, chased my dream and got the call-up for the friendly with South Africa in March.
"Everything I did from June 2013 onwards was with the goal of making it here to the World Cup."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article