ENGLAND selector Mick Newell has defended opener Adam Lyth following his Ashes struggles.
The Yorkshire batsman has failed to make a serious impact so far against Australia, hitting just 72 runs in six innings with a highest score of 37.
England head to Trent Bridge for the start of the fourth Test on Thursday 2-1 up after an eight-wicket win at Edgbaston last week put them on the brink of a series victory.
England have already changed their batting line-up this series, with Jonny Bairstow replacing Gary Ballance and Ian Bell and Joe Root moving up the order.
Nottinghamshire's Alex Hales has also been tipped to replace Lyth but Newell insists the opener's position is safe.
"We haven't even discussed anything beyond this Test match," Newell told Sky Sports.
"Adam Lyth has everyone's confidence to come out here on Thursday and score runs for England. He has justified his place in the team and scored an awful lot of runs for Yorkshire to get into this team and he has a Test match century under his belt, so he has everyone's confidence.
"It's up to players like Alex Hales and others to push their cases in the county games."
Victory in Nottingham will see England regain the Ashes and Newell is hopeful the wicket can favour their bowling attack.
"It's looking good. The groundsman is preparing the pitch as he always does," he said.
"I think the main issues are that we want to make sure it has pace, carry and bounce through to the wicketkeeper and the slip fielders are there to take the catches as they come. The main issues for us are mainly pace and bounce in the wicket."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here