A year after experiencing a career high by reaching his first grand slam final, Kei Nishikori suffered the opposite emotions yesterday as he was sent packing in the first round, beaten by the Frenchman Benoit Paire.
The fourth seed held two match points in the fourth set before going down 6-4, 3-6, 4-6, 7-6, 6-4 to Paire, ranked 41, an ignominious return to the scene of his greatest performance.
Such is the interest in Nishikori that a number of Japanese reporters were turned away from the US Open this year, the media rooms at Flushing Meadows unable to cope with the demand. After yesterday’s result, they might just be changing their travel plans.
“I don’t think I played bad,” said Nishikori, who had been seeded to meet world No 1 Novak Djokovic in the semi-finals. “I didn’t play great but it’s never easy, first match and he’s a good player. It’s very sad to lose in the first round but he was playing good tennis. It’s just one match, it’s tough to lose in five sets but I fought to the end.”
The tall Paire, who hit 21 aces, sounded like he was heading straight to the pub after what was the best win of his career. “I think I had a really good day serving today,” he said. “I saved two match points so I was a bit lucky but to beat Nishikori, for me, it was unbelievable for me to imagine it. I’m going to have a good time with my coach and team and everybody, but hopefully I’ll be ready for my next match.”
Defending champion Marin Cilic fared better, beating the Argentinian qualifier Guido Pella 6-3, 7-6, 7-6. And there was a heart-warming win for Mardy Fish – in four sets against Italy’s Marco Cecchinato – having spent the past three years dealing with severe anxiety disorder.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here