MANAGERS bemoaning the number of games their team has played and using a punishing fixture list as an excuse for a below par display is commonplace towards the end of a long hard season.
But after eight just matches? The reason Derek McInnes came up with for Aberdeen failing to perform anywhere near their capabilities in their encounter with Hearts last night was a startling one at such an early stage in a new campaign.
In fairness to McInnes, whose team had by far the better of their second Ladbrokes Premiership of the new term at Pittodrie yesterday afternoon, it was a fourth match in nine days for his charges. It definitely showed.
A Europa League qualifier against NK Maribor of Slovenia, a league game against St. Johnstone and a Betfred Cup match with Ayr United, all away from home, this month had clearly taken a heavy toll.
With Andrew Considine, whose wife had given birth the night before, and Jonny Hayes, who is out injured, both absent from the starting line-up, Aberdeen failed to produce a performance to match the occasion in front of a crowd of 13,559.
The fact they kept a clean sheet and picked up a point against rivals who had won their last three meetings last season was some consolation given the difficult circumstances surrounding the game. McInnes expects better, far better, is to come.
“We were clearly the better side,” he said. “We moved the ball about in the first half. But we have got to make more of that good play. I thought we were bright, got in between the lines and brought pace to the game. Niall McGinn, Wes Burns and Peter Pawlett all showed good movement and appetite for the game.
“I always felt the first half was going to be crucial in this one. We had to get ourselves ahead. There was, without question, a clear lack of energy and lack of quality at times in the second half. Players are out on their feet.
“Graeme Shinnie and Ryan Jack were a real indication for me. Those boys are as fit as any player going. You could see in the last 20 minutes or half an hour that they were plodding through the game. That is a consequence of four games in nine days for the majority of my players."
Hearts had been “deeply disappointed” by the SFA judicial panel’s decision on Thursday to ban Jamie Walker for two games for an “act of simulation” in the game against Celtic at Tynecastle last Sunday.
The punishment meted out to the winger, who was absent from the squad yesterday, had clearly also incensed the Hearts fans. “There’s only one Jamie Walker,” they chanted as the match got underway.
The decision by referee Kevin Clancy to have a word with Hearts manager Robbie Neilson, who had been unhappy that no penalty was given to his team following a challenge by Shay Logan on Sam Nicholson, was also badly received by the travelling support. There appeared to be, though, nothing in the incident and the match official had been correct to allow play to continue.
Clancy had a busy afternoon and booked no fewer than seven players, five from Hearts and two from Aberdeen. The visitors have often been criticised, including by their own supporters, for the uncompromising brand of football they produce. This outing did little to dispel their image as one of the more robust top flight outfits.
Neilson, though, anticipates that his team’s crime count will calm down. “We have had quite a few bookings in the first few games of the season,” he said. “But we have played the teams that were first, second and fourth in the league last time around. These games are always high intensity. The players are desperate to beat each other. I expect it to come back down again.”
The Hearts coach was pleased his team had prevented their opponents from scoring after losing 3-2 to St. Johnstone in Perth in the Betfred Cup in midweek. “A defender’s job first and foremost is to stop people scoring goals,” he said. “On Wednesday night we let in three. That is unacceptable. To get a reaction like that today is great.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here