THE fact that Scotland’s last two Grand Slams came the year after a Lions tour is generally accepted to be no coincidence. In 1983 and again six years later, some key Scots players went on tour, saw at close quarters that they were by no means inferior to their English, Welsh and Irish counterparts, and proved as much in the following spring’s Five Nations Championship.
The situation has changed in these days of European competition and cross-border leagues, and Scots no longer have to travel to Australia, South Africa or New Zealand to measure themselves against their closest international rivals. But a Lions tour can still improve a player both mentally and physically: the concentration of talent on both sides in the Tests makes sure of that.
Obviously, then, it is desirable for Scottish rugby that we have a good representation in Warren Gatland’s party to tour New Zealand this summer when it is announced on Wednesday. Alas, it is equally obvious that the chances of having a big Scots contingent have diminished severely since the turn of the year. Injuries have played a part, as ever, but so too has the failure to rise to the occasion in crucial games.
This time last year, both Willem Nel and John Hardie, starters for Edinburgh and Scotland at tighthead and openside respectively, would have been strong contenders. Today they are still awaiting a comeback from injury. Huw Jones, outstanding in the centre for Scotland, is another who had surely played his way into Gatland’s thoughts only to find himself sidelined by injury.
Similarly, after the win over Ireland in the first round of the Six Nations, Greig Laidlaw looked like having a chance, if only because Gatland had said he was looking for an experienced leader of the midweek team. Now, Laidlaw too is on the way back from injury, and Ireland’s Rory Best has become the likely man for that midweek role.
Scotland’s improvement in the Six Nations might normally have propelled a few less experienced names into contention, but the Lions head coach has rightly emphasised the importance of playing at top form in away games as well as at home. And, while the loss in Paris was a narrow one, the crushing defeat at Twickenham had to weigh heavily on Gatland’s calculations.
Glasgow Warriors’ Champions Cup quarter-final loss at Saracens was probably the last chance for Finn Russell to play himself into a Lions jersey: if so, it was a chance he did not take. The injury that forced Jonny Gray off in the first quarter of that game may well have ensured that the lock, like the stand-off, will not go on to play against the All Blacks.
So who will go? Stuart Hogg remains the most probable pick, while Sean Maitland - like the full-back a tourist four years ago - may have to fight it out with Tommy Seymour. (Maitland and Duncan Taylor, incidentally, both start for Saracens today in what could be one last opportunity to stake a claim to a seat on that plane.)
Richie Gray also toured in 2013 and at his best would have a chance of a Test place, but if there is to be a third Scot on tour alongside Hogg and Maitland or Seymour, the most deserving choice would be Hamish Watson. The Edinburgh openside has just kept on getting better at a time when his own team have been falling apart, and that strength of character in adversity is precisely the quality Gatland will need from his players if they are to win the three-match series against the All Blacks.
SCOTLAND’S LIONS SINCE PROFESSIONALISM
1997 tour to South Africa
Original squad: Tom Smith, Alan Tait, Gregor Townsend, Rob Wainwright, Doddie Weir
Replacement: Tony Stanger
2001 tour to Australia
Original squad: Scott Murray, Tom Smith, Simon Taylor
Replacements: Gordon Bulloch, Andy Nicol
2005 to New Zealand
Original squad: Gordon Bulloch, Chris Cusiter, Simon Taylor
Replacement: Jason White
2009 to South Africa
Original squad: Nathan Hines, Euan Murray
Replacements (before tour began): Mike Blair, Ross Ford
2013 to Australia
Original squad: Richie Gray, Stuart Hogg, Sean Maitland
Replacement: Ryan Grant
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here