ANDY MURRAY described his Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters exit as "progress" and admitted he would have accepted a third-round defeat 10 days ago.
The world No.l was 4-0 up in the deciding set against Albert Ramos-Vinolas before the Spaniard hit back to qualify for the quarter-finals with a 2-6 6-2 7-5 victory.
Murray was returning from injury at the tournament having been sidelined with an elbow problem since March 12.
The 29-year-old told Sky Sports: "If I'd been offered this result a week, 10 days ago, I would've taken it
"I didn't know if I was going to be able to play here or not.
"For me personally - it's not going to seem it to everyone watching - but it's progress from where I was 10 days, a couple of weeks ago.
"I'm going to need to put some work in, there are something things I need to improve upon. But it wasn't too bad."
Murray's serving woes continued as he was broken seven times during the see-saw encounter in Monaco.
The Scot started his second-round match against Gilles Muller on Wednesday with three double faults in the first four points of the match and it did not get much better in his match-up against clay-specialist Ramos-Vinolas.
Murray, however, was not too concerned with his serve.
"If you''re serving for two weeks 30, 40, 50 kilometres an hour slower than what you're used to, you're going to serve slightly differently and then when you start serving fast again it just takes a bit of time to get into a rhythm," he added.
"I felt like - even though I didn't hold serve that much today - that I served better than I did in my last match. Second serve had a little bit more speed on it, less double faults, a few more aces.
"That's something that I think will keep getting better.
"I was really happy with how my elbow felt this week. It got better each day. I'm going to need to obviously improve my serving over the next few weeks."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here