CHRIS SUTTON has claimed John Souttar is a downgrade from Connor Goldson for Rangers.
The Celtic hero made the bold claim as he discussed a pre-contract swoop for the Hearts stopper.
Rangers tonight confirmed Souttar has agreed a switch to Ibrox in the summer when his Hearts contract expires.
And Hearts also noted the news while sending a warning to Rangers that it would take a "significant" fee for Souttar to leave this month.
The move gives Giovanni van Bronckhorst defensive back-up into the summer with Goldson's contract set to run out at the end of the season.
And Sutton reckons Goldson is already thinking about his next move but insisted Souttar is not at the same level as the current Rangers stopper.
Speaking on BT Sport's Scottish Football Extra, Sutton said: “I think that he’s a good player.
“John Souttar is a right-sided centre half, I think the issue with Rangers is what is going to happen to Goldson, it looks like he wants to jump ship.
“Is he like for like for Goldson? I don’t think he’s at Goldson’s level, not that Goldson has been exceptional this season; I think he has been a really good player, a stonrg player for Rangers.
“With respect to John Souttar, I think it’s a downgrade.”
Rangers hero Ally McCoist joined the discussion by insisting Souttar could become a very good signing if he stays injury free.
But it's the player's fitness that is the only concern for McCoist after the move was confirmed.
He said: "My only concern is, and this is not a criticism I think it's a little bit of statement of fact, unfortunately for the lad I think he's a little bit injury prone.
"I'd love to see him just get a run of games and go and play because I definitely think there is a talent there.
"I definitely think there's improvement in him. Is he the same standard of Goldson right now; I'm not sure - however I definitely think it'll be a good signing.
"I definitely think potentially in the long-run hopefully if he stays injury free he could be a very good signing for Rangers, I really do."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel