THERE is no guarantee physical activity levels will increase in Scotland as a result of the Commonwealth Games, a key official has admitted.
Paul Zealey, head of engagement and legacy at Glasgow 2014, said while much had been done to make the most of the sporting opportunity, he could not promise widespread change in exercise levels. Research has shown that major sporting events in other countries did not alter the lifestyles of the population.
Analysis following the London Olympics in 2012 found a slight decrease in the number of people participating in sport three times a week after the event.
Speaking from the National Physical Activity and Health Alliance (PAHA) Conference in Edinburgh yesterday, Mr Zealey said: "We are in a very good position to be better. We are still not in a position that will guarantee there is a longterm physical activity legacy from the games."
Mr Zealey said there had been investment in areas such as sports coaching and Scotland has seen "a very significant increase" in the number of young people who are members of sports clubs.
Glasgow 2014 is also working with partner organisations to promote non-sporting activities, such as walking, he said.
Mr Zealey added: "What we have done is learn from the experiences of other global sporting events."
Professor Mike Weed, of Canterbury Christ Church University, researched the impact of London 2012. He said one of the mistakes made was to assume the games themselves would encourage people to take up exercise. Instead he said investment was needed to stimulate interest.
Shona Robison, cabinet secretary for sport, also addressed the PAHA conference, at Murrayfield stadium. Ms Robison said: "We are certainly ready to welcome the world this summer. It is an opportunity for Scotland to shine on the world's stage."
However, she added that the lasting legacy could not be left to chance. She said: "We know major sporting events themselves do not necessarily lead to behaviour change and it is the energy that surrounds it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article