A TINY Pacific island nation of just 100,000 people has become the new powerhouse of the Commonwealth Games - according to a 'real' medal table which measures success in terms of a country's population.
Kiribati, situated half way between Hawaii and Australia, finds itself top of the population-based medal analysis after native David Katoatau won gold in weightlifting's 105kg Group A. He had previously finished 17th out of 21 in the same category in the 2012 Olympics.
His gold was the 310-square-mile state's first medal at a major event.
An updated unofficial table which works out the number of golds per million of population put Kiribati top with 9.9 golds as of 6pm yesterday, Grenada, with a population of 105,000, was second with 9.52, New Zealand was third with 2.69 and Scotland fourth with 2.45.
Official table-toppers England, with a population of 53.5 million, dropped from eighth to tenth in the table compiled by statistical experts in New Zealand.
Famed Scots novelist Robert Louis Stevenson spent time in 1888 and 1889 on Kiribati, then known as the Gilbert Islands, and his wife reputedly designed a new flag for the natives. But they were less than pleased with the result which was a shark with a crown on its head.
Britain discovered the islands in 1788 and they were originally named after the captain who first set foot on the islands. Kiribati was given self rule in 1971 and complete independence in 1979 under the new name.
When it comes to the overall strike rate for medals of any hue, Grenada now tops the list as its gold and bronze count equates to 19.05 medals per million of population.
Samoa (15.87) places second, and the Isle of Man (11.76) takes third, while Scotland (7.34) is in seventh position.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article