Jonathan Trott will take a second break from professional cricket after another flare-up of his stress-related illness.
A joint statement by Trott's employers at the England and Wales Cricket Board and Warwickshire yesterday confirmed that he will stop playing with immediate effect.
Trott, who had to leave England's Ashes tour after the first Test in Brisbane last November for the same reason, made a shortlived comeback at the start of this season. He played first in a friendly for Warwickshire against Gloucestershire at Edgbaston, then a first-class match against MCCU Oxford University and last week in his county's opening championship fixture against Sussex.
It was after that match, in which he scored 37 and 26, that he decided he could not continue.
"At the completion of the LV=CC match between Warwickshire and Sussex on April 16, 2014 - in which he played - Jonathan experienced a repeat of stress-related symptoms which were diagnosed during England's Ashes series in Australia," said a statement released by the ECB and Warwickshire.
"Jonathan will now undergo further treatment to assist with his long-term rehabilitation.
"Both parties confirm that their primary concerns are for Jonathan's health and well-being, and re-iterate that they will continue to offer him their full support."
Trott, 33 next week, is one of several England cricketers to have experienced mental health difficulties in relatively recent times.
In 2006, Marcus Trescothick returned home from India and again the following winter at the start of an Ashes tour. Then, Trott's one-day international team-mate Michael Yardy also had to leave the sub-continent towards the end of England's 2011 World Cup campaign. Both men returned to county cricket, and are still playing with distinction for Somerset and Sussex respectively.
There is no indication as yet as to whether Trott will be able to do likewise in due course.
But he has explained why, at present, he cannot continue for Warwickshire or England. "It was with the best intentions and hope that I returned to cricket with Warwickshire this month," he said.
"Much to my disappointment, since my first game, I have felt the same anxieties that occurred during my time in Australia. It is not fair on my team-mates or myself to continue when I am unable to function at 100%. In order to play at the highest level you have to be at 100% and be able to concentrate fully at all times. Sadly I am unable to do this.
"With this in mind I have decided it is best for all involved that I continue my recovery on the sidelines for the time being."
Trott's international career has been outstanding to date. In 49 Tests, he is a three-time Ashes winner and was a cornerstone of the team which took England to the top of the International Cricket Council rankings two years ago.
A rock-solid presence at No.3, he was named the ICC's international player of the year in 2011 and has a Test average of 46.65 and one well above 50 in one-day internationals.
The ECB yesterday expressed the hope that he "will be given the privacy, time and space he needs to make a full recovery".
Over the past month, Trott's every move and performance came under inevitable scrutiny as the feasibility of his international return was assessed. He gave interviews in mid-March to three outlets across broadcast, print and online media, in which he said his problem was "burn-out".
That remark, and some others, were not universally well-received -with former England captain Michael Vaughan the most outspoken of critical pundits. The former England captain tweeted yesterday morning. "Just hearing the Jonathan Trott news," he wrote. "Very sad and I wish him a full recovery."
ECB chief medical officer Nick Peirce, meanwhile, specified the circumstances surrounding Trott's decision to take a second break from his sport. "Jonathan has had a recurrence of the stress-related illness that ruled him out of all cricket this winter from late November," he said.
"Despite Jonathan wanting to play for Warwickshire from the start of the season, having spent time with him yesterday it is clear he will benefit from a further period away from the game. He will continue with the comprehensive support programme the ECB has put in place to assist his rehabilitation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article