Alastair Cook was left "gutted" and "raw" after being stripped of England's one-day captaincy and dumped from the World Cup squad.
Cook turns 30 on Christmas Day, but there will be no festive cheer this year after the four-man selection panel decided at the 11th hour that the opening batsman did not warrant a place in a 15-man party that will now be led by Eoin Morgan.
England officials from coach Peter Moores to managing director Paul Downton had publicly backed their skipper throughout a testing 2014, which included this month's 5-2 series defeat in Sri Lanka.
But in private the ECB's powerbrokers harboured the same reservations as a litany of distinguished commentators, led by Cook's predecessors Nasser Hussain and Michael Vaughan.
A personal return of 119 runs in six innings in Sri Lanka proved the final straw, with the left-hander appearing crease-bound, tentative and out of step with the modern 50-over game.
After a selection meeting lasting several hours on Friday, followed by a personal meeting at Cook's home, the curtain formally came down on the skipper's tenure yesterday morning. He will now be no more than a frustrated spectator as England head Down Under for January's Tri-Series against Australia and India before the World Cup begins on February 14.
Cook's response was, like too many of his recent innings, brief. "I am gutted to be left out of the World Cup squad, and it is likely to take me a while to get over the disappointment," he said.
Downton, who does not have an active role in selection but sat in on the meeting, shed further light on Cook's state of mind.
The Essex man will remain Test captain and hopes are high that the likely end of his limited-overs career will see a return to his formidable best in the longer form, but Downton's words made it clear the wounds run deep.
"He had a dream to lead England at the World Cup and it's been taken away from him a month away from its fulfilment," Downton said. "He still believes he's the right man for the job, but the selectors had to make a decision in the best interests of English cricket.
"He's very raw, but hopefully in time he will reflect that he wasn't scoring runs, he was putting himself under an awful lot of pressure and that he will now free up his mind to focus on Test cricket."
James Whitaker, who acts as national selector alongside Moores, Angus Fraser and Mick Newell, explained the panel's verdict. He said: "Everything went into the discussion and we gave it our full attention for a number of hours. It was a long meeting. It was felt unanimously that we had to change because Alastair was no longer in the sort of form he is capable of. He wasn't in our best 15."
Morgan was not the only name considered as Cook's replacement, and his form has been in a trough as well, but the Dubliner is seen as the most savvy one-day thinker in the England set-up.
"We discussed a couple of different people," Whitaker said. "Eoin has had captaincy experience and when he has captained England it's generally brought the best out of him. We hope he sets a course in one-day cricket that will be very positive. His form was talked about, but we felt he could be stimulated by this. We feel he's the right man to take us forward."
Cook's axing shunted the rest of the squad announcement well down the agenda, but the decision to cut all-rounder Ben Stokes is significant. Seen as the rising star of English cricket after last winter's Ashes, his game has deteriorated and he has now fallen behind Chris Jordan and Chris Woakes in the pecking order.
Yorkshire's Gary Ballance is the chief beneficiary of Cook's exit, drafted into the group to challenge for a middle-order spot.
Meanwhile, Jonathan Trott will resume his international career by captaining the England Lions four-day team on the tour of South Africa next month.
England one-day squad for the tri-series against Australia and India and the ICC Cricket World Cup: E Morgan (capt), M Ali, J Anderson, G Ballance, I Bell, R Bopara, S Broad, J Buttler, S Finn, A Hales, C Jordan, J Root, J Taylor, J Tredwell, C Woakes.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article