England still believe they can win the second Investec Test and level the series against South Africa although those prospects were far from obvious after day two of a contest which is forecast to be interrupted significantly by rain.
Stuart Broad is optimistic that, as long as the hosts can replicate the determination and skill shown by Alviro Petersen (182) in the Proteas' 419, there may still be some room for manoeuvre.
After England had replied with 48 for no wicket in a final session shortened by bad light and then rain, Broad said: "It's pretty even, I think. Being none down for us was vital, and tomorrow the first hour will be huge, because we all have one job, and that's to bat as big and as long as we can."
To that end, Broad will be pinning his hopes on one of England's front-line batsmen repeating the heroics Alastair Cook produced at Edgbaston last year.
There, Cook piled up a career-best 294 against India which first gave England their world No.1 position – a status which is in peril, at 1-0 down with one to play against South Africa.
"We need one of those Edgbaston knocks – 600 – and then put South Africa under pressure on the last day," said Broad, who finished with three for 96. "I think this wicket will eventually get lower, and that's where the four quick bowlers can come into their own: hitting the pitch, and the ball going underground."
Petersen, meanwhile, might not be available to bat again after having gone for a scan on his right hamstring last night.South Africa assistant coach Russell Domingo said: "From what we've heard, it is possibly a grade one tear – which is possibly 10 days or so – but nothing too serious at this stage."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article